So, if you want to charge your iPhone XS or iPhone XS to 50 percent in 30 minutes, you'll have to invest in a USB-C power brick ($49) and USB-C-to-Lightning cable ($20). While the iPhone XS supports faster wireless charging, Apple still doesn't include what you need for fast wired charging in the box, even though every other Android phone maker does with its flagships. When we retested the original iPhone X recently as part of our battery testing for the new phones, that time fell to 9 hours, 51 minutes, which could be because the websites we use in our browsing test are using more Javascript and other code than before, putting stress on the phone's bqttery. That's shorter than the iPhone X's endurance, with that phone lasting 10 hours, 49 minutes when we tested it last year. The iPhone XS turned in a just-OK runtime of 9 hours and 41 minutes. The iPhone XS Max has a larger capacity of 3,174 mAh, based on regulatory filings. The drums had more punch on the new phones, too.īased on a teardown of the iPhone XS and XS Max, the iPhone XS packs a 2,658 mAh battery, which is smaller than the 2,716 battery in the iPhone X. On the iPhone X, his voice seemed to recede into the background. When listening to Imagine Dragon's "What It Takes," Dan Reynolds' vocals sounded much more present on the iPhone XS. MORE: Smartphones with the Longest Battery Life Apple says it widened the stereo sound to deliver more detail, and I immediately appreciated the difference when I put the iPhone X and the iPhone XS side by side. The audio boost in the iPhone XS and iPhone XS Max is so good that you'll think twice about connecting to a Bluetooth speaker. It makes Head's Up feel like Rock, Paper, Scissors. For instance, the HomeCourt app leverages your iPhone's camera to show you how many basketball shots you make and miss during a given session, and a multiplayer Galaga game from Directive Games that lets you and some friends shoot alien spaceships in the same room at the same time. I still think AR apps could be more compelling, though more are on the way using Apple's ARKit 2.0. Apple's usdz file format makes this a reality. I could make it bigger or smaller with pinch-to-zoom, and get up real close to see the stitching and zipper. I was also completely engrossed in the game when I tried shopping on the Magnolia Market website and pulled up a leather bag I could place right in front of me. The graphics rendered smoothly even when there were big explosions. I also had a blast playing Smash Tanks, which allowed me to fling tanks around slingshot-style. For instance, in the new elemenTao puzzle game, the iPhone XS Max was faster to load the experience than on the iPhone X, and it was able to scan for and place the virtual world on a table more quickly.įrom there, I could zoom in on a landscape, complete with clouds, mountains and water, and use the wind and even bolts of lightning to move a ball toward its goal. The next-generation Neural Engine inside the A12 Bionic on the iPhone XS is now up to nine times faster than what the A11 offered, which can give a sizable boost in augmented-reality apps. Apple's phone scored higher Aztec Ruins test (1,604.7 frames to 851.7 frames) and on the Car Chase test (1,744.44 frames to 1,103 frames). In a separate graphics benchmark that has a more intense workload, GFX Bench 5, the iPhone XS Max crushed the the Galaxy Note 9. Both of those numbers are below the Galaxy Note 9's 4,639, but they're a lot higher than the 2,227 turned in by the older iPhone X. To test graphics performance, we ran 3DMark Slingshot Extreme, and the iPhone XS Max scored 4,339 and the iPhone XS hit 4,244. Those scores smoke the fastest Android phones around, including the Snapdragon 845-powered Galaxy Note 9 (8,876) and the OnePlus 6 with 8GB of RAM (9,088). On Geekbench 4, which measures overall speed, the iPhone XS Max scored 11,515, while the iPhone XS hit a slightly lower 11,420. MORE: The Best Smartphones Available Right Now The older iPhone X was also slower than the iPhone XS at 26, 7.2 and 10 seconds for the above apps. The Note 9 was slower across the board at 35 seconds, 7.2 seconds and 9.1 seconds, respectively. How about opening apps? The iPhone XS took 20.8 seconds to open Fortnite, 4.9 seconds for Pokémon Go and 6.17 seconds for the Asphalt 9 racing game. The Galaxy S9 took 2:32, and the OnePlus 6 finished in 3:45. It took Apple's phones just 39 seconds to transcode a 2-minute 4K clip to 1080p. The iPhone XS and the iPhone XS Max also shined in other real-world tasks, such as video editing. It's just a half-second difference or so, but it's noticeable, and I appreciate being able to unlock my phone faster than on last year's iPhone X. That's because of improved algorithms in iOS 12 and the speedier A12 chip. Before we even get to the benchmark scores, it's important to note that Face ID is faster on the iPhone XS and the iPhone XS Max than on the iPhone X.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |